Tobacco Plant Leaves Can Be Used To Make Efficient Biofuel

tobacco plant leaves can be used to make efficient biofuel_In a new study, researchers from the Biotechnology Foundation Laboratories at Thomas Jefferson University, US, have identified a way to increase the oil in tobacco plant leaves, which may be the next step in using the plants for efficient biofuel.

According to Vyacheslav Andrianov, assistant professor of Cancer Biology at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, tobacco can generate biofuel more efficiently than other agricultural crops.

However, most of the oil is typically found in the seeds. Tobacco seeds are composed of about 40 percent oil per dry weight.

Although the seed oil has been tested for use as fuel for diesel engines, tobacco plants yield a modest amount of seeds, at only about 600 kg of seeds per acre.

Dr. Andrianov and his colleagues sought to find ways to engineer tobacco plants, so that their leaves expressed the oil.

“Tobacco is very attractive as a biofuel because the idea is to use plants that aren’t used in food production,” Dr. Andrianov said.

“We have found ways to genetically engineer the plants so that their leaves express more oil. In some instances, the modified plants produced 20-fold more oil in the leaves,” he added.

Typical tobacco plant leaves contain 1.7 percent to 4 percent of oil per dry weight.

The plants were engineered to overexpress one of two genes: the diacyglycerol acytransferase (DGAT) gene or the LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 (LEC2) gene.

The DGAT gene modification led to about 5.8 percent of oil per dry weight in the leaves, which about two-fold the amount of oil produced normally.

The LEC2 gene modification led to 6.8 percent of oil per dry weight.

“Based on these data, tobacco represents an attractive and promising ‘energy plant’ platform, and could also serve as a model for the utilization of other high-biomass plants for biofuel production,” Dr. Andrianov said. Newstrack India

Watch Less TV And Burn More Calories!

watch less tv & burn more calories_Lessening the time spent in front on television can help burn calories, according to a new study. As per the background information of the study, an average adult watches almost five hours of television every day.

The study used an electronic lock-out system to reduce the television time by half without changing the calorie intake.

However, it was found more energy was spent over a three-week period. Jennifer J. Otten, Ph.D., R.D., then of the University of Vermont, Burlington, and now of Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif., and colleagues conducted a randomized controlled trial of 36 adults who had a body mass index between 25 and 50 and reported watching at least three hours of TV per day.

Between January and July 2008, all participants underwent a three-week observation period during which their daily TV time was assessed.

A group of 20 individuals was then randomly assigned to receive an electronic device that shut off the TV after they had reached a weekly limit of 50 percent of their previously measured TV viewing time. An additional 16 participants served as a control group.

It was found that those with the lock-out systems burned 119 more calories per day during the three-week period, while the control group burned 95 fewer calories per day during the intervention than during the observation period.

Also, Energy balance-the comparison of calories consumed to calories burned-was negative in the intervention group (who consumed 244 calories less than they burned each day) but positive in the control group (who consumed 57 more calories than they burned each day); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

The authors wrote: “A recent task force report supports small behavior changes as a more sustainable, long-term approach to help address the obesity epidemic.

“It has been estimated that combined increases in energy expenditure and decreases in energy intake equaling only 100 calories per day could prevent the gradual weight gain observed in most of the population.”

In the past it has been found in children that screen time reductions reduce calories consumed but do not increase calories burned.

The authors concluded: “This suggests that adults may differ from children in how they respond to reductions in sedentary behaviors”.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure the effects of a TV reduction intervention in adults. Reducing TV viewing should be further explored as a method to reduce and prevent obesity in adults.” The Times Of India

Ancients ‘Had Heart Disease Too’

ancients had heart disease too_Hardening of the arteries has been found in Egyptian mummies – suggesting that the risk factors for heart disease may be ancient, researchers say.

A team of US and Egyptian scientists carried out medical scans on 22 mummies from Cairo’s Museum of Antiquities.

They found evidence of hardened arteries in three of them and possible heart disease in three more.

All the mummies were of high socio-economic status and would have had a rich diet.

Details of the study by the University of California, the Mid America Heart Institute, Wisconsin Heart Hospital and Al Azhar Medical School in Cairo appear in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The team said the subjects’ bodies had been preserved by mummification because they were serving in the court of the Pharaoh or were priests or priestesses.

The X-rays were checked by five experienced cardiovascular imaging physicians on the team.

They showed that 16 of the 22 mummies had identifiable arteries or hearts left in their bodies after the mummification process.

Nine of these had calcified deposits in the wall of the artery leading to the heart or in the path where the artery should have been.

Some mummies had calcification in up to six different arteries.

Definite hardened arteries or atherosclerosis, in other words a build-up of fat, cholesterol, calcium and other substances in the blood vessels, was present in three.

Of the mummies who had died when they were older than 45, seven out of eight had calcification whereas only two out of eight of the younger mummies did.

There were no differences in calcification between men and women.

‘No hunter-gatherers’

The researchers said that while ancient Egyptians did not smoke tobacco, eat processed food or lead sedentary lives, they were not hunter-gatherers.

Agriculture was well-established and meat consumption appears to have been common among those of high social status.

Dr Gregory Thomas, from the University of California, said: “While we do not know whether atherosclerosis caused the demise of any of the mummies in the study, we can confirm that the disease was present in many.

“So humans in ancient times had the genetic predisposition and environment to promote the development of heart disease.

“The findings suggest that we may have to look beyond modern risk factors to fully understand the disease.”  BBC News

Asteroid Passes Just 8,700miles From Earth – With Only 15 Hours Warning

asteroid passes just 8,700 miles from earth_Although no one noticed at the time, the Earth was almost hit by an asteroid last Friday.

The previously undiscovered asteroid came within 8,700miles of Earth but astronomers noticed it only 15 hours before it made its closest approach.

Its orbit brought it 30 times nearer than the Moon, which is 250,000 miles away

But before you head for the nuclear bunkers you will be relieved to learn the tumbling rock was only 23ft across. Similar sized objects pass by this close to Earth about twice a year and impact on the planet about once every five years.

Astronomers believe the object, called 2009 VA, would have almost completely burned up while entering Earth’s atmosphere, causing a brilliant fireball in the sky but no major damage to the surface.

The asteroid was discovered by the Catalina Sky Survey on November 6, 2009. It was then identified by the Minor Planet Centre in Cambridge, Massachusetts as a near Earth object.

Nasa’s Near Earth Object Programme plotted the orbit of the object and determined that although it would fly extremely close to our planet it wouldn’t hit us.

It was the third-closest known (non-impacting) Earth approach on record for a cataloged asteroid.

The Nasa NEO programme aims to detect and track at least 90 per cent of the 1,000 asteroids and comets that approach Earth and are larger than 0.6miles in diameter, by 2020.

They monitored a 100ft asteroid that whizzed 45,000 miles above the Earth’s surface on March 2 this year. A similar sized object slammed into Tunguska, Siberia in 1908. The impact created a blast so powerful it levelled 1,200 square miles of forest. By Claire Bates, The Daily Mail

Himalayan Glaciers Most Threatened By Global Warming

himalayan glaciers most threatened by global warming_Just before starting his lecture on ‘Atmospheric Brown Clouds,’ Prof V. Ramanathan admits that people think he has come to dismantle Indian progress.

The Director of the Center for Clouds, Chemistry and Climate, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, in a recent address to the International Federation of Environmental Journalists in New Delhi, said the world was already committed to a global warming of 2.5 degrees Celsius.

“Think of greenhouse gases as covering the earth like a blanket,” he starts off.

The blanket traps the heat, but there are also other particles such as sulphates and nitrates in the atmospheric brown clouds, which function as mirrors.

The good news, he says, is global warming may be delayed and the bad news is that smoke particles or mirrors absorb the sunlight and heat the blanket directly.

CFC Regulation

Since he left India in 1970 (he was a refrigeration engineer then), he has been publishing nothing but bad news, admits Prof. Ramanathan. One molecule of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) has the same greenhouse effect as have 10,000 molecules of carbon dioxide. “If we had not regulated CFC, we would have faced a climate catastrophe.”

In 1980, Prof. Ramanathan predicted that the planet would warm up by 2000. In a 1983 study, he said non-carbon dioxide trace gases contributed as much as CO{-2} to the increase in atmospheric greenhouse effect.

“They thought Ram has gone crazy, but all that came true,” he says.

“I feel sad that the system is behaving as we are predicting it. The only hope we have is that our prediction will be wrong.”

“We have made the blanket thick enough to heat the planet by 2.5 degrees Celsius. The Artic summer ice will be the first to go and the Himalayan glaciers are the most threatened by global warming over 2.5 degrees Celsius.”

There is a 50 per cent probability that the planet will warm by 2.5 degrees Celsius “because of what we have already done.” There was a failure to anticipate this all along.

The “mirrors” (sulphates, nitrates, etc) in the atmospheric brown clouds mixing with rain form acid and it is no longer a good idea to rush out and feel the first rains. “When the mirrors are gone, you get the full blast of global warming.”

The last G8 meeting said emissions would be cut by 50 per cent by 2050.

However, CO{-2} concentration is still increasing and even with the aim of reducing emissions by 50 per cent, only the rate of warming would be slowed down.

“The world thinks that if you cut CO{-2} emissions all will be fine,” he says.

Uncertain Science

The science of climate change is uncertain at best; even if the Copenhagen summit succeeds, temperatures could rise in the future to 3.5 per cent, Prof. Ramanathan forecasts. Pointing fingers is not a solution, he says, quoting Mahatma Gandhi that an eye for an eye will make all of us blind.

Referring to his own study, initially called the Asian Brown Cloud, Prof. Ramanathan admits that it was a mistake.

Brown clouds are everywhere now, and they absorb sunlight and have the direct impact of suppressing rain. India is darker by 5-10 per cent, and its rainfall pattern is changing. Even in China, the same thing is happening. Glaciers are surrounded by brown clouds; even on Mount Everest, there is evidence of black carbon deposition, apart from soot on the Tibetan glaciers and the Artic.

The Himalayan glaciers also show evidence of black carbon. The hope lies in the fact that black carbon in the atmosphere is 55 per cent. Alternative cooking fuels could reduce human deaths and clear the air, so to speak, and there is need to focus on reducing black carbon, which has a short life of less than 10 days in the atmosphere. But black carbon and smoke have a deadly effect on human health. Indian contributes six per cent black carbon, though its contribution of biofuels is just one per cent. China accounts for about four times more.

The last slide in Prof. Ramanathan’s presentation showed his little granddaughter on his shoulder. “Need a personal reason for wanting to solve the problem? Lead by USA and Europe is critical for reducing committed warming. Engagement of Asia is critical for reducing future commitment,” he says. By Meena Menon, The Hindu

Balancing Energy Needs & Material Hazards

balancing energy needs_First Solar should have a bright future doing business in the European Union. Based in Tempe, Arizona, the company is among the top solar manufacturers in the world. Most of the company’s annual sales of $1.2 billion already are in Europe, where nations have committed to generating a fifth of their power from renewable sources by 2020.

The rapid growth of First Solar is the result of its focus on ultrathin photovoltaic panels that are more versatile than conventional crystalline models. The technology has helped displace the view that solar power could never become an affordable or realistic way of lowering emissions on a large scale.

But these new panels contain a compound of cadmium, an extremely toxic metal already banned from most products in Europe. The compound is made with the element tellurium to create cadmium telluride, which enables the conversion of light to electricity.

Companies like Calyxo, a unit of Q-Cells in Germany, use similar technologies. General Electric, the U.S. conglomerate, recently announced plans to market cadmium telluride panels.

But First Solar is the world’s largest maker of such panels, and they are its sole product, and that makes the company more vulnerable than many of its competitors to a new effort to tighten up laws on hazardous chemicals in Europe.

Concerns for First Solar deepened when the Swedish government, which holds the rotating E.U. presidency, proposed during the summer that an updated version of the law on hazardous substances should include all electronic products.

The goal of the Swedes was to avoid loopholes as a wide variety of new products reach the market. But it is of particular concern for the makers of solar panels, which were not previously covered by the law, known as the directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.

E.U. governments and the European Parliament still must agree on whether to broaden the scope of the law. But if they do, the ultrathin panels made by First Solar could be subject to heightened scrutiny. They could even face the prospect of a ban sometime in the future.

The panels raise new kinds of questions about what constitutes sustainable development and the issue highlights some of the environmental trade-offs faced by governments seeking a future based on low-carbon, clean energy technologies.

Another prominent example is compact fluorescent light bulbs.

These bulbs sip power and hugely improve the energy efficiency of homes and offices. But they contain mercury, a metal that is dangerous in high quantities, and opponents and health campaigners stress the importance of preventing the toxic metal from leaking into the environment.

The bulbs already have a form of exemption from the E.U. law. But that precedent — because the exemption may be only temporary — is something that executives from First Solar want to avoid.

Instead, executives at First Solar would like a permanent exclusion for solar products written into the law.

The executives say that the prospect of a ban at any time in the future risks turning off buyers who invest in such systems for periods of as long as 25 years and that a ban could cost thousands of manufacturing jobs.

The European Photovoltaic Industry Association, an industry organization, has aired similar concerns. Last week, it warned that a “young, growing industry” still striving “to reach competitiveness” should not be subject to the hazardous waste rules.

Underlining the risks faced by First Solar, a committee in the European Parliament is expected in coming days to propose a way of keeping pressure on solar companies to come up with alternatives to cadmium telluride.

People familiar with the contents of the report, who requested anonymity because the details were not yet public, said it would propose that solar companies using cadmium be allowed to apply for four-year, renewable grace periods.

The legislative process still is at a preliminary stage. Countries like France and Italy with growing solar industries are likely to encourage the Parliament and other governments to give First Solar a permanent exclusion.

First Solar already employs about 700 people in Europe out of more than 4,000 globally. The company’s second-largest factory opened in Germany in 2007, and the company is planning to build another factory in France.

Executives at First Solar also pointed to a report commissioned by the French government concluding that “risks are negligible” to human health during normal operation of the panels. The executives said the company had set up a voluntary system that would be funded in advance to recycle and reuse 95 percent of the cadmium and tellurium in its modules sold worldwide.

“We see no intention by legislators to include solar panels in revised legislation on hazardous substances,” said Brandon Mitchener, a spokesman for First Solar in Europe. “We believe that our thin film panels are one of the best ways to get Europe to hit its renewable goals.” By James Kanter, The New York Times

Global Warming Cycles A Threat To Endangered Primates

global warming cycles_Two Penn State University researchers have carried out one of the first-ever analyzes of the effects of global warming on endangered primates. This innovative work by Graduate Student Ruscena Wiederholt and Associate Professor of Biology Eric Post examined how El Niño warming affected the abundance of four New World monkeys over decades. The research will be published on 28 October 2009 in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters, a fast-track journal of the Royal Society of London.

Wiederholt and Post decided to concentrate on the way the oscillating weather patterns directly and indirectly influence plants and animals in the tropics. Until the research by Wiederholt and Post, this intricate network of interacting factors had rarely been analyzed as a single system. “We know very little about how climate change and global warming are affecting primate species,” explains Wiederholt. “Up to one third of primates species are threatened with extinction, so it is really crucial to understand how these changes in climate may be affecting their populations.”

The scientists focused on the large-bodied monkeys of South America, which are highly threatened. Choosing one species from each of the four genera of Atelines, Wiederholt and Post examined abundance trends and dynamics in populations of the muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus, formerly B. arachnoides) of Brazil, the woolly monkey (Lagothrix lagotricha) in Colombia, Geoffroy’s spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi), which was studied on Barro Colorado Island in Panama, and the red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) in Venezuela.

For each species, long-term research projects carried out by other teams over decades have documented the abundance and feeding patterns of these primates. By studying the different species, Wiederholt and Post hoped to highlight the importance of the response to changing climate conditions of the trees that provide the dietary resources for the monkeys. All the species live in social groups and spend most of their time in the trees of tropical forests, using their limbs and prehensile tails to move around or to suspend themselves from branches. The monkeys differ in the proportions of fruit, flowers, and leaves in their diets. Woolly monkeys and spider monkeys predominantly eat fruit, howler monkeys specialize in leaf-eating, and muriquis also eat leaves but consume more fruit than howlers. “Long-term studies like those we derived data from are incredibly valuable for illuminating effects of global warming,” Post said. “Unfortunately for endangered species, such studies also are incredibly rare. We hope our results bring attention to the importance of maintaining long-term monitoring efforts.”

The team hypothesized that the trees’ response to the warming events might provide a crucial link between changes in climate and monkey abundance. To test their hypothesis, Wiederholt and Post needed to compare information on the monkey populations with data on fluctuations in food resources such as leaves, seeds, and fruits. Then, using statistical models, they investigated how food and abundance information related to annual temperature and rainfall information.

Detailed ecological information was not available on each of the forests in which the target species live, so the team used information from Barro Colorado Island — a lowland, moist, tropical forest where Geoffroy’s spider monkey was studied — as a general indicator of what happened over time in each of the habitats. From Barro Colorado, the scientists knew the number of tree species that were fruiting and flowering each month during the years between 1987 and 2004. They also looked at the annual values of flower and seed production for 44 specific tree species with seeds that are spread by mammals.

To examine these factors on a regional and local scale, Wiederholt and Post used information on mean annual temperature, rainfall, and the length of the wet and dry seasons for the years between 1960 and 1990 in Venezuela, Brazil, Barro Colorado Island, and Colombiaavailable. They obtained these data from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and from the Center for Climatic Research at the University of Delaware. “We expected to find a strong relationship between the large-scale climate and the population dynamics of these species,” explains Wiederholt. “We also wanted to tease out which measures of vegetation-response to climatic conditions were most influential.”

The scientists obtained large-scale climate data from the southern oscillation index (SOI), the El Niño-Southern Oscillation indices (ENSO3, 34, 4, and 12), and the Southern Hemisphere temperature-anomaly index, which are available from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean provided a rainfall anomaly index. The El Niño and La Niña phases of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO — often called simply “El Niño”) are the cycles of warm/dry and cool/wet periods in oceanic and atmospheric temperatures in the tropical Pacific region. These cycles often are associated with disruptive events in to central and northern South America, such as floods, droughts, or disturbances in fishing or agriculture.

The results of the team’s analyses were spectacular. All four monkey species showed drops in abundance relating to large-scale climate fluctuations. Even though the monkey populations were separated by large distances, the three fruit-eating species had synchronous responses to large-scale warming. During El Niño warming events, trees produced more fruit than usual. Then, during the subsequent La Niña cooling events, the trees produced much less fruit, resulting in a local scarcity or even famine.

Some ecologists have speculated that high production of fruit during El Niño events may have been triggered by the increase in solar radiation, despite lower-than-usual rainfall. However, high productivity during an El Niño event might also use up the stored reserves of the trees, which would have difficulty recovering during the subsequent La Niña events, when weather was wet, cloudy, and cool. This mechanism would explain why the fruit-eating monkeys showed a delayed response to the El Niño events after a lag of one or two years.

Howler monkeys also showed declines with warm and dry El Niño events, but their population fall was out of sync with that of the fruit-eating species. The mechanism is not yet clear, but Wiederholt has some ideas. She notes, “Primate researchers have seen elevated adult female mortality and lowered birthrates among red howlers in drought years. Since leaf flush often occurs at the start of the wet season, a prolonged dry season might delay the availability of this resource for the howlers and perhaps cause them nutritional stress.”

Warmer temperatures also may cause leaves — the howlers’ primary food — to mature faster, which would accelerate the leaves’ acquisition of toxins and other chemical defenses against monkeys. The factor that the scientists found was most influenced by changes in climate was the monthly maximum number of tree species that were fruiting. Climate changes also were highly correlated with the monthly maximum number of species that were flowering and with annual seed production. The length of the dry season also was highly correlated with annual flower production. Thus, vegetation responses to climatic conditions substantially altered the food resources available to primates, which in turn influenced the decline or rise in monkey abundance.

Global warming already has produced a rise of 0.74 degrees over the last century, and an additional increase of 1.8 to 4 degrees Celsius is anticipated over the next century. “El Niño events are expected to increase in frequency with global warming,” explains Post. “This study suggests that the consequences of such intensification of ENSO could be devastating for several species of New World monkeys.”

The researchers say that now, more than ever, quantitative studies that delineate the complex ecological links between climate, vegetation, and animal survival are urgently needed.

This study was funded by Penn State’s Graduate Fellowship Program in a grant to Ruscena Wiederholt. redOrbit